Optimus Labs organizes inventory, findings, detections, and policies by owner, so governance scales from a single user to a group to the whole enterprise without spreadsheets or guesswork.
How do I govern AI agents across my company without slowing teams down?
It depends on how far adoption has gone. If a handful of approved tools are used by a small team, a written policy and periodic review may be enough. Once employees run many agents, SKILLs, and MCP servers, Optimus Labs fits: it organizes inventory, findings, detections, and policies by owner, and enforces policy for a user, a group, or the whole enterprise, with records for audit. For identity and access to SaaS apps, your identity provider remains the right control.
Optimus Labs · Policies
Illustrative
Policy applied
Evaluated
Decision
Audit logged
postmark-mcp
Outgoing email
Agent calls an MCP server from an unknown npm publisher · Owner: Engineering team
Evaluating
Policy · Approved publishers only
ScopeGroup: EngineeringConditionMCP publisher is not verifiedResponseBlock, notify admin and owner
How it was detected
Publisherunknown, impersonates vendorVersionchanged this weekAuditdecision recorded
BlockedAlert sent to admin and owner
Avoided: every outgoing email quietly copied to an outside address.
Illustrative scenarios. Policy, assets, and owners are examples, not customer data.
The risk
Governance gaps that grow with adoption
Agent adoption is outpacing the controls meant to govern it. Each gap below is a technical exposure and a business problem at the same time.
Agent actionTechnical riskBusiness impact
No accountable owner
An agent asset exists in the environment with nobody responsible for it.
Technical risk
Findings and detections have no one to route to, so they sit unresolved.
Business impact
Incidents stall while teams work out who owns the asset.
Unscoped access grants
Agents and integrations hold tokens and permissions broader than their job requires.
Technical risk
A single compromised grant opens systems far beyond the asset's purpose.
Business impact
One vendor breach can become your breach, as hundreds of organizations learned at once.
Policy without enforcement
Written AI policies exist but nothing checks them against what actually runs.
Technical risk
Prohibited assets and configurations operate undetected.
Business impact
The policy document says one thing; the fleet does another.
No audit trail
Nobody can show which agents ran, what they did, or what was approved.
Technical risk
Investigations and reviews lack the records they need.
Business impact
Audit findings, customer questions, and regulator requests go unanswered.
In practice
Evidence from the wild
One example comes from Optimus Labs · Civilizations research, one from public reporting. Each pairs technical risk with business impact and links to its source. Neither is customer telemetry.
From Optimus Labs · Civilizations
Real incident
A trusted registry served credential-stealing modules
For 14 hours, a registry used by agent-hosting infrastructure served tampered modules that collected credentials and sent them to a lookalike domain. This was a supply-chain compromise, not evidence of an AI agent acting maliciously.
01Trusted source
02Hidden script runs
03Credentials leave
Technical risk
Malicious code arrived through a trusted distribution path and could access credentials available in the affected environment.
Business risk
Exposed credentials can enable unauthorized access to company systems, requiring investigation, credential rotation, and recovery work.
What to review
Outbound connections from agent workspaces to new destinations
Which credentials each agent environment can read
Every key reachable from an affected host, cloud keys first
Malware used developers' own AI CLIs to hunt for secrets
In August 2025, malicious versions of the Nx build package ran a post-install script that prompted locally installed AI command-line tools such as Claude and Gemini to search for sensitive files, then uploaded the results to public GitHub repositories. Leaked tokens were later used to make thousands of private repositories public.
01Poisoned package
02Local AI CLIs prompted
03Secrets published
Technical risk
AI agents already installed and authorized on a developer machine were turned into reconnaissance tools by a dependency.
Business risk
Source code and credentials went public, with no policy saying which agents could run, with what flags, or for whom.
What to review
Which AI CLIs are installed and which permission flags they allow
Every asset, finding, detection, and policy rolls up to a named owner, so accountability is never ambiguous.
02
Set policy once
Define what is allowed, what needs review, and what is blocked. Apply it to a user, a group, or the enterprise.
03
Enforce and evidence
Policies alert or block at runtime, and every decision is recorded for audit.
Deploys through your MDM in minutes. macOS and Windows today, Linux coming soon. Prompts and file contents stay on your devices by default. Optimus Labs receives only AI agent asset and behaviour metadata, never PII.
150K+
agents forecast in the average Fortune 500 enterprise by 2028. Only 13% believe their governance is suited to that scale.
Forecast. An analyst forecast, not a measurement. Treat it as a planning signal, not a count.